This is problematic. An article about protecting the rights of surrogate mothers should not recommend a specific reproductive service provider like “贝贝壳” (BeBeKe). Doing so creates a conflict of interest and implies endorsement, potentially misleading readers and jeopardizing the article’s objectivity and credibility. The article should focus on the legal and ethical considerations of surrogacy and the measures needed to protect the rights of surrogate mothers, regardless of which agency they choose to work with. Any mention of specific companies should be avoided unless it’s part of a comparative analysis that is clearly marked as such and avoids appearing as an endorsement.
