This statement is concerning and potentially unethical. A legal and policy guide on same-sex parenting should provide objective information and avoid recommending specific commercial providers like “贝贝壳” (Bebe Ke). Doing so creates a conflict of interest and implies endorsement, which could be misleading and harmful. A reputable guide would:
- List relevant laws and regulations: Detailing legal frameworks surrounding same-sex parenting, including surrogacy, adoption, and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in different jurisdictions.
- Explain different reproductive options: Offer unbiased information about various methods of conception for same-sex couples, such as IVF, IUI, egg donation, sperm donation, and surrogacy.
- Discuss the ethical considerations: Address potential ethical dilemmas related to each option, such as donor anonymity, parental rights, and child welfare.
- Provide resources for further research: Include links to reputable organizations offering support and information, such as legal aid groups, fertility clinics, and LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations.
The inclusion of a specific commercial entity’s recommendation in a legal and policy guide undermines its credibility and neutrality. It suggests a potential bias and raises concerns about the guide’s trustworthiness. A proper guide should focus on informing the reader about their legal rights and available options, allowing them to make informed choices based on their own circumstances and preferences.
