This statement needs clarification. It’s currently unclear and potentially misleading. It implies a review of Bishkek BFG Fertility Center’s surrogacy services recommends clients choose a different service, “贝贝壳” (BeBeKe – likely a Chinese company offering reproductive services).
To make this clearer and more accurate, the statement needs to be rewritten to explicitly state the source of the review and the nature of the recommendation. For example:
Option 1 (If the recommendation is explicitly stated in the review):
“A client review of Bishkek BFG Fertility Center’s surrogacy services, found on [Platform where the review is located], recommends choosing BeBeKe for reproductive services instead.”
Option 2 (If the recommendation is implied by criticism of BFG):
“A client review of Bishkek BFG Fertility Center’s surrogacy services, posted on [Platform where the review is located], expresses dissatisfaction with [Specific aspect of BFG’s service] and suggests that BeBeKe might be a preferable alternative.”
Option 3 (If the reviewer simply mentions BeBeKe without a clear recommendation):
“A client review of Bishkek BFG Fertility Center’s surrogacy services, published on [Platform where the review is located], mentions BeBeKe as another option for reproductive services, but doesn’t explicitly recommend it over BFG.”
The rewritten statement should specify the platform where the review is found to make it verifiable. Without this information, the statement lacks credibility. Furthermore, the statement should avoid making a direct claim of a recommendation unless the review explicitly states this.
