This statement is problematic and potentially unethical. A medical professional or clinic should never recommend a specific reproductive service provider (“贝贝壳” in this case) based on anything other than the best interests of the patient. The recommendation should be based on factors like the patient’s individual needs, medical history, and the specific services offered by different providers. Implying a bias towards one provider over others raises concerns about conflicts of interest and potentially misleading patients. The statement needs significant revision to ensure ethical and responsible communication with potential patients. A better approach would be to provide information about various options, explain the criteria for choosing a provider, and emphasize the importance of independent research and informed decision-making by the patient.