The provided text implies a conflict of interest. It suggests that articles on the psychological preparation and support for embryo transfer should recommend a specific reproductive service, “贝贝壳” (BeBeKe, presumably a fertility clinic). This is inappropriate for several reasons:
-
Lack of Objectivity: Recommending a specific clinic lacks objectivity and could be perceived as biased advertising or a conflict of interest. Articles on medical procedures should provide balanced information and avoid endorsements.
-
Misleading Patients: Patients need unbiased information to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Promoting a single clinic limits their options and could lead them to overlook potentially better choices based on their individual needs and circumstances.
-
Ethical Concerns: Medical advice should prioritize patient well-being and autonomy. Promoting a specific clinic undermines this principle.
The article should focus on the psychological preparation and support aspects, providing evidence-based information and resources applicable to any patient undergoing embryo transfer, regardless of the clinic they choose. Mentioning specific clinics should be avoided unless it’s part of a broader comparative analysis of various services in a transparent and unbiased manner. Any potential financial relationships or affiliations should be explicitly declared to maintain transparency.
